Grappus
Overall Review Rating
4.3 (8 Ratings)
Overview
They are a fiercely restless creative studio with a broad vision across design & product experiences. Big brands and startups approach us because they find a cool team of committed individuals with great taste, obsessed with technology, originality, music, art & quality. They believe in independence, curiosity, experimentation, and reinvention as the beacons to navigate the world. They work with top brands to help them explore why they develop products, not only how they develop them.
Services
- Digital Marketing
- Chat Bots & AI Development
- Data Science & Big Data
- Mobile App Development
- iOS App Development
- Cross Platform Development
- 3D & Interior Design
- Web Development
- Content Marketing
- Cloud Computing
- Android App Development
- Hybrid App Development
Industries Served
Grappus Reviews
Have a look at these client reviews on previously delivered projects.
Radosław Kowalczyk
Head of Development - Wisła Software Sp zooProposal matched the outcome. That alignment is rarer than vendors acknowledge.
What set this team apart in practice was their engineering judgment — specifically, their willingness to tell us when our requirements were wrong and explain what to do instead. Not every vendor does that. The consultative element elevated the final output well beyond what our original brief described. We ended up with something better than what we had asked for, which is not a sentence I expected to be writing in a review.
Project summary
Route optimisation was being handled in spreadsheets. The operational cost of that was measurable and the fix was obvious — but it required engineering investment we had been deferring.
Kelsey Drummond
Director of Digital Health - Crestline Health PartnersComplex project, zero drama. That is how you know the project management is real.
The technical quality is the obvious thing to highlight. The automated test suite is comprehensive, the deployment pipeline is solid, and the documentation is actually useful rather than written to satisfy a checklist. But the metric I keep coming back to is what has NOT happened since go-live. No 2am incident calls. No emergency patches. No post-launch retrospectives about what went wrong. For a system of this complexity, that outcome is exactly what we paid for.
Project summary
Our product thinking was strong. Our execution capacity in this specific domain was limited. We needed deep expertise, not a generalist willing to learn on our time.
Samantha Doyle
Product Manager - Reef Digital Pty LtdConsulting engagement that paid for itself in avoided rework within six months
Honestly, I came into this engagement with some scepticism. We had a bad experience with a vendor twelve months earlier and I wanted to see evidence of competence, not just hear about it. The discovery documentation was the first signal. The sprint delivery consistency was the second. By go-live I had stopped being sceptical and started planning how to expand the engagement. The production system has been stable from day one and our internal team loves working with the codebase they left us.
Project summary
Years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was functional but limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.
Vikram Srinivasan
Head of Platform - Cascade EdTech SolutionsDesign system that finally brought visual consistency to a product with four years of debt
The knowledge transfer at the end of the project was notably good. Too many vendors see handover as a tick-box exercise. This team ran structured sessions, produced documentation our internal team actually references, and spent real time making sure we understood the architecture decisions well enough to maintain and extend the system independently. Six months later we are doing exactly that without needing to go back to them for every question.
Project summary
Our previous vendor had left us with a codebase that worked but was nearly impossible to extend. We needed to fix that without stopping delivery to the business.
Hyun-Su Lim
Director of Platform - Hanam Tech SolutionsDelivered what the proposal described. More rare than it should be.
The knowledge transfer at the end of the project was notably good. Too many vendors see handover as a tick-box exercise. This team ran structured sessions, produced documentation our internal team actually references, and spent real time making sure we understood the architecture decisions well enough to maintain and extend the system independently. Six months later we are doing exactly that without needing to go back to them for every question.
Project summary
Digital service standards required citizen-facing systems that our inherited infrastructure simply could not meet. Remediation was not viable — the only credible path was replacement.
