Overall Review Rating
4.1 (7 Ratings)
Services
- Big Data
- Machine Learning
- Web Development
- Cross Platform Development
- Android App Development
- AI Development
- Branding
- iOS App Development
- AWS Services
- 3D & Interior Design
- Mobile App Development
- Platform Development
Industries Served
TTMS Reviews
Have a look at these client reviews on previously delivered projects.
Tobias Lindemann
Leiter Digitalisierung - Lindemann Industrie GmbHDelivered what the proposal described. More rare than it should be.
The technical quality is the obvious thing to highlight. The automated test suite is comprehensive, the deployment pipeline is solid, and the documentation is actually useful rather than written to satisfy a checklist. But the metric I keep coming back to is what has NOT happened since go-live. No 2am incident calls. No emergency patches. No post-launch retrospectives about what went wrong. For a system of this complexity, that outcome is exactly what we paid for.
Project summary
Our LMS was built for classroom-first delivery. Hybrid learning had exposed every assumption it was built on, and student satisfaction data confirmed it.
Lynne Robichaud
Director of Product - Atlantic Digital CorpTechnically strong, commercially fair, and genuinely good to work with
What set this team apart in practice was their engineering judgment — specifically, their willingness to tell us when our requirements were wrong and explain what to do instead. Not every vendor does that. The consultative element elevated the final output well beyond what our original brief described. We ended up with something better than what we had asked for, which is not a sentence I expected to be writing in a review.
Project summary
Years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was functional but limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.
Radosław Kowalczyk
Head of Development - Wisła Software Sp zooProposal matched the outcome. That alignment is rarer than vendors acknowledge.
What set this team apart in practice was their engineering judgment — specifically, their willingness to tell us when our requirements were wrong and explain what to do instead. Not every vendor does that. The consultative element elevated the final output well beyond what our original brief described. We ended up with something better than what we had asked for, which is not a sentence I expected to be writing in a review.
Project summary
Broker portal satisfaction scores had fallen for two consecutive years. Specific feedback pointed to the same workflow frustrations. We needed a redesign, not a patch.
Eoghan Fitzgerald
VP of Engineering - Shannon Tech Solutions LtdDesigned for actual user behaviour, not the persona document we thought was accurate
The platform has been live for six months and is handling three times the transaction volume we scoped for. That is not because we underestimated — it is because the architecture choices made during discovery were genuinely forward-thinking. Most vendors design for exactly what you tell them. This team designed for what you are likely to need. We are already scoping the next phase and there was no question about who we would use.
Project summary
As a technology company ourselves we hold our vendors to the same standard our clients hold us to. Finding a partner who could meet that bar without being hand-held through the process was the challenge.
Yuki Hashimoto
Head of Product Development - East Asia Commerce KKCompliance programme delivered on time and approved without remediation
The knowledge transfer at the end of the project was notably good. Too many vendors see handover as a tick-box exercise. This team ran structured sessions, produced documentation our internal team actually references, and spent real time making sure we understood the architecture decisions well enough to maintain and extend the system independently. Six months later we are doing exactly that without needing to go back to them for every question.
Project summary
Our actuarial models had outgrown the reporting infrastructure feeding them. Data latency was introducing risk into pricing decisions at a rate the business would no longer accept.
